Comparing and Contrasting Thomas Hobbes and John Locke Essay

doubting Thomas Hobbes and behind Locke were two of the great political theorists of their time. They both(prenominal) provided fantastic philosophical texts on how our political relation should govern us. This paper will demo the largest differences and slightly of the similarities between Thomas Hobbes Leviathan and John Lockes Second Treatise on Civil Government. Although they do pretend some similarities, Hobbes and Locke have different faces on most of their political arguments, and I will expand on their differences on the state of nature, political science, and societal contract.Hobbes view of the state of nature and Lockes view of the state of nature offer remarkable differences. Hobbes believed tribe act on their own self-interest, and they would go to any extreme to help themselves. He believed we are always in competition with each other for the best food, shelter, money, and so on. Hobbes believed the best way to protect citizens would be to have a free that is intimidating and all-powerful.The view Locke had on the state of nature is conceptually different. Lockes view of the state of nature says that humans have limits as to what we should or should not do, but he believed that humans are generally prudish to one another, and we will not bother one another. Therefore, in Lockes state of nature, humans are peaceful. Hobbes, however, believes that humans live in a state of war and fight with each other constantly.Hobbes and Locke did not have many of the same views on judicature. Though it is not directly declared in his text, most historians believe Hobbes was a supporter of absolute monarchy. He believed the government should have absolute authority over all the citizens. He believed if such a government did not exist, we would live in a world of turmoil. The sovereign (government) has the obligation of keeping the peace and, when need be, home(a) defense. The sovereign establishes all the laws, and has complete legislative, judicia l, and executive authority.Lockes view of government is very different from Hobbes. Locke believes mountain should have a say in government, and Hobbes would disagree with this statement. Hobbes believes that the sovereign should own all the land, but Locke believes that property is toffee-nosedGod gave us this property, and we should use and enjoy it. Locke is also a supporter of the market economy. He believes that when one invests his own labor, whatever he makes should cash in ones chips his own private property.Government is very much linked with Hobbes and Lockes views on social contract. Social contract binds the people and the government together. Hobbes thinks that citizens should abandon all of their rights to the sovereign, because the sovereign knows what is best for them. Theoretically, in Hobbes view, there actually is no contract, because the citizens have no rights. His view of social contract is more the likes of a covenant. The only time the citizens fuel say n o to a sovereign is when the sovereign threatens self-preservation. For example, citizens may be interrogated for a crime, but they do not have to confess.Lockes view of social contract is basically different from that of Hobbeshis view is not as well defined. Locke believes a social contract is an agreement made between citizens who institute a government to prevent people from occasionally violating the natural laws. Locke believes the contract between the people and the government should be conditional. For the government to have the obedience and loyalty of the citizens, the government must perform certain functions and act appropriately.Although they have several differences, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke do share some of the same beliefs. Both Hobbes and Locke were fanatic almost politics, and they both wanted to promote the common good. Both theorists believed in the state and laws of nature they just had different interpretations of it. Also, both Hobbes and Locke both bel ieved that people are free and equal in the state of nature. Hobbes and Locke both believed that the native purpose of the government is to protect people. However, if the government does not protect the citizens, the citizens can revolt and go against or above the sovereign. The most important similitude between Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, however, is that their works were influential in geological formation people and government in regards to how a society should operate.Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were the two most influential political theorists of their time. However, they had opposing views on more or less every political issue. Their theories stem from their dissenting opinions about who should be the center of attention of government Hobbes believed there should be a monarch, while Locke supported Parliament. Examples of both mens thoughts and opinions can be found throughout history. France and some other European countries sided with Hobbes and had absolute monarchi es, while England and later the American revolution used Lockes thoughts in developing their governments. Hobbes and Locke wrote about and educated the citizens about the two extremes of running governments, and their opinions were so valuable that we still study them today, thereof this paper.